Compare prices and save on cheap DVDs at CheapestDVDPrice.com
Compare prices and save on cheap DVDs at CheapestDVDPrice.com HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.
CheapestCDPrice.comCheapestDVDPrice.comCheapestTextbooks.com
Multi-Store DVD Search
  
Title Director
Actor/Actress Keyword (eg. Title and Actor)
(What's this?)
Selected Product:

2001 - A Space Odyssey
2001 - A Space Odyssey

DVD
Format: Widescreen
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Publisher: Warner Home Video
Release Date: June 2001
UPC: 012569553927


Average Customer Rating:
Score = 4.0Score = 4.0Score = 4.0Score = 4.0Score = 4.0
Similar Products

Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Two-Disc Collector's Edition)
Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Two-Disc Collector's Edition)
UPC: 043396126497



2010: The Year We Make Contact
2010: The Year We Make Contact
UPC: 012569505322
List Price:$9.98



Pixar Short Films Collection: Volume 1 [Blu-ray]
Pixar Short Films Collection: Volume 1 [Blu-ray]
UPC: 786936737820
List Price:$34.99



Our Review: To use our price comparison search engine and get the cheapest price, please click on the "Find the Cheapest Price" button located above and let us locate the best place to buy 2001 - A Space Odyssey (1968) starring Keir Dullea, Gary Lockwood .

At this time we have not yet written a review for 2001 - A Space Odyssey (1968) starring Keir Dullea, Gary Lockwood . Please continue checking back to this page as we are constantly adding reviews.

For your convenience we have added a summary for 2001 - A Space Odyssey (1968) starring Keir Dullea, Gary Lockwood , supplied by Amazon.com.

Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com

Summary:
When Stanley Kubrick recruited Arthur C. Clarke to collaborate on "the proverbial intelligent science fiction film," it's a safe bet neither the maverick auteur nor the great science fiction writer knew they would virtually redefine the parameters of the cinema experience. A daring experiment in unconventional narrative inspired by Clarke's short story "The Sentinel," 2001 is a visual tone poem (barely 40 minutes of dialogue in a 139-minute film) that charts a phenomenal history of human evolution. From the dawn-of-man discovery of crude but deadly tools in the film's opening sequence to the journey of the spaceship Discovery and metaphysical birth of the "star child" at film's end, Kubrick's vision is meticulous and precise. In keeping with the director's underlying theme of dehumanization by technology, the notorious, seemingly omniscient computer HAL 9000 has more warmth and personality than the human astronauts it supposedly is serving. (The director also leaves the meaning of the black, rectangular alien monoliths open for discussion.) This theme, in part, is what makes 2001 a film like no other, though dated now that its postmillennial space exploration has proven optimistic compared to reality. Still, the film is timelessly provocative in its pioneering exploration of inner- and outer space consciousness. With spectacular, painstakingly authentic special effects that have stood the test of time, Kubrick's film is nothing less than a cinematic milestone--puzzling, provocative, and perfect

Customer Reviews
Average Customer Rating:Score = 4.0Score = 4.0Score = 4.0Score = 4.0Score = 4.0

Great movie
Customer Rating: Score = 5Score = 5Score = 5Score = 5Score = 5
I love this movie I have seen it about 50 times since I was a child. It is very moving and it certainly makes you think about our place in the Universe.

Better than regular DVD but not as good a picture as it should be
Customer Rating: Score = 3Score = 3Score = 3Score = 3Score = 3
Resolution is great of course but image quality was not up to what a BlueRay image should be. Overall a great way to see 2001 but did not measure up to my expectations in visual quality.

2001: A Space Idiocy.
Customer Rating: Score = 1Score = 1Score = 1Score = 1Score = 1
2001: A Space Odyssey (Stanley Kubrick, 1968)

Back in my junior-year literary theory text (almost twenty years ago now), I remember someone-- can't remember who it was, though-- going on about how the deconstructionists went "running around turning sacred cows into shishkebab." I've always loved that image, not least because when I run across a sacred cow, it's always been the case that my mouth starts watering and I get out the skewers. In this case, I had no idea that Ligeti's Requiem was used so extensively in 2001: A Space Odyssey. I love Ligeti, and find the Requiem very enjoyable, and hearing it that much was quite a pleasure. Which is the last positive thing I'm going to say about this interminable piece of pretentious silliness.

I was never a Kubrick fan (thanks to his desecration of The Shining) until I saw Lolita a few years ago, which clued me in to the fact that Kubrick did, once, deserve all the acclaim. A friend of mine soon after forced me to watch The Killing, which I was also inordinately fond of given that it's a pretty standard noir (blame my background as a horseplayer). I gradually loosened my mind's hold on the idea that Kubrick was entirely (save the first forty-five minutes of Full Metal Jacket; too bad the rest of it's so terrible) unwatchable and sat down to watch some of the movies universally lauded as classics. This, of course, is one of them; Kubrick fans can sit and argue for hours about whether 2001 or A Clockwork Orange is the better movie. (Interestingly, I've found critics tend to acknowledge both, but then go on to argue for hours over whether his best work is Spartacus or Paths of Glory.) I've now seen both, over the course of a few days, and will unequivocally cast my lot at the feet of A Clockwork Orange (while reserving the right to claim that, of those I've seen, Lolita is by far his strongest work). Not because I fell head over heels in love with A Clockwork Orange, which was decent but not special, but because I loathed 2001 with every fiber of my being. About three quarters of the way through the film, I came to the conclusion that the reason everyone praises HAL 9000 as the quintessential film villain is because he doesn't have much to compete against where this movie is concerned; the acting in John Carpenter's basement-budget spoof Dark Star is orders of magnitude better than any actor comes up with in this movie. Not that there's a terribly large amount of acting to be done; huge swaths of the movie are devoid of acting (or, for that matter, characters). We don't actually find the main plot arc until almost an hour into the movie, and it disappears half an hour before movie's end. The rest is theme, theme, theme, and my god, does it get tiresome. Kubrick's ham-handed treatment of sociopolitical topics is nothing new to me-- he showed all the subtlety of a hammerblow to the face in Full Metal Jacket and Eyes Wide Shut-- but he never had as large a canvas to do it with as he did here, and he made sure to scrawl in every corner.

I'm relatively sure that had I first seen this movie in my idealistic teen years-- or, perhaps even more so, had I seen it for the first time in a chemically altered state that I haven't experienced since those same teen years-- I probably would have enjoyed it a great deal more. For that's what the movie reminds me of, an acid trip. The problem being, of course, that (a) as anyone who hangs out with druggies can tell you, acid trips are a lot more fun when you're having them than watching them, and (b) Kubrick is on a very, very bad trip; this is the most nihilist portrayal of the human condition I've seen outside a Hideshi Hino film.

While I've watched a lot of movies recently that have been anywhere from horrible to horrendous in their mediocrity, incompetence, or silliness-- and I've enjoyed any number of those despite it-- I can't remember the last time I out-and-out hated a movie. Movies have made me apathetic, they've annoyed me, they've caused me to wonder if the guy who greenlighted certain projects still has a job, but I seriously can't put my finger on the last movie I watched and desperately wanted to turn off halfway through because they were so very, very awful. I have only, in fact, done so with three films in the course of over thirty years of movie watching (and twenty-two in movie reviewing). 2001: A Space Odyssey came close to being number four at least six times during the two and a half hours of my life I wasted watching it. A thoroughly execrable experience. (zero)


one of the top 10 films of all time
Customer Rating: Score = 5Score = 5Score = 5Score = 5Score = 5
I remember watching this when I was young and being profoundly bored. I saw it again recently and was simply amazed. Every moment blazed with something new. Even after all these years it remains futuristic. The ideas were mentally expansive. What an astounding artistic achievement. It kind of makes other films seem trivial by comparison. I think it may well be the greatest film ever made.

Do NOT read any reviews before watching this!
Customer Rating: Score = 5Score = 5Score = 5Score = 5Score = 5
Posting this is probably futile, since you'll only see it if you're reading reviews here -- but if you haven't seen 2001, stop reading about it!

This is an amazing film, but one of its biggest strengths is its openness to interpretation. Your initial viewing should be one without expectations, and you should draw your own conclusions about the reason for what you see on screen. After you have formed your own interpretation, *then* you should read what others think.

By reading others' interpretations before viewing the film, you're destroying its greatest strength.

Site Map | Contact Us
© 2006 CheapestDVDPrice.com. All rights reserved. Privacy Statement and Disclaimer
web site design and support by Crystal Solutions